Being anti-slavery simply meant you didn’t agree with slavery; being an abolitionist meant you’d crossed a bridge inside yourself, from “I don’t agree” to “Not on my watch.” Which are you in relation to a corporate aristocracy that has corrupted our govt and eroded our democracy?

Dec 24, 2019 · 9:17 AM UTC

80
321
26
1,650
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about Land Back to Native Americans?
2
7
Yes. The Black Hills of South Dakota.
3
3
31
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
We agree. Now explain why you think that it's a good idea to make government bigger and give it more control!
1
1
The issue is not how big or small government is; the issue is who it’s working for. Right now, mainly due to the undue influence of money on our political system, our government does more to advocate for short term corporate profits than it does to advocate for us.
4
5
31
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
#Marianne2020
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Were are you in relation to the abortion industry?
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about casual abortions? Where do you line up on that human rights issue?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Except abolitionists not only ended slavery itself and fought a civil war over it, abolitionists rescued slaves from the South to bring them to the north. You don’t know your history.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I don't believe they are related. One involves people being whipped and forced to work. The other one involves people who created jobs and they are offering voluntary jobs to people. Banning corporal punishment at tax-funded schools would be more akin to ending slavery
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It appears the uniting factor is a #narcissism spectrum pathology that affects members of government and some members of corporate America. It appears methods exist that award uncontested contracts to major US corporations. Operatives devise ways to distribute illicit tax dollars
2
Load more