Whether Bennett, Harris, Castro, Booker, me or anyone else, neither $ nor polls (no transparency there!) nor DNC should be allowed to “narrow the field” before IA or NH. That’s the PURPOSE of primaries! The debates are undemocratic & should only exist if all candidates included.

Dec 23, 2019 · 12:25 AM UTC

53
157
33
771
What it amounts to is the modern equivalent of old time backroom deals where guys with cigars decided who the candidates would be: “Don’t let anyone but our guys get in here.” Paternalism is NOT democracy. People who think they “know best” don’t always do.
8
18
3
146
Why does this matter so much? It matters because neofascists are literally at the door, and those who paved the way for this danger are NOT necessarily those who know how best to deal with it. DNC controlling things caused a catastrophe in 2016 & it’s a slow moving car crash now.
5
44
3
209
We have to passionately & powerfully support whoever the Democratic candidate in ‘20. But right after the election - whomever wins- we need to break the chokehold of the undemocratic campaign industrial complex.Only the unfiltered voice of the people is wise enough to handle this
15
45
3
223
Replying to @marwilliamson
Agree, agree, agree, agree. I was ignorant enough not to see this narrowing as undemocratic, until you educated me. In Chicago we had 17 candidates for our mayoral primary early this year.
1
19
To me, that’s healthy for democracy
1
5
32
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne, Kamala dropped out. lol🥺😔
1
9
But she dropped out because of money! That’s my point.
5
8
2
55
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne, if you or any other candidate can i get 5% in the polls, I’m sorry, but you will not be our next president. There are like 15 people running, and only 5 of them have any realistic shot of winning. I only care about what those 5 have to say, sorry!
8
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
If your leading in the polls such as sanders to be a fair and honest person maybe you should speak out against the DNC