People working for the government whose conclusions challenge the president’s policies are being moved away from positions of power. Should we be concerned? You betcha! politico.com/story/2019/05/2…

Nov 29, 2019 · 7:11 PM UTC

17
51
4
143
Replying to @marwilliamson
We need to get ride of the deep state so that the elected officials, who ever they might be, are in charge. You will want people to work for you that are under you when you get there, NO? .... .... 1440?
1
In other words, you would prefer a dictatorship to democracy.
2
2
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
No, because we have an election for a new President every 4 years, and he/she should have like minded people working with him.
1
2
This is not about like-minded. This is about people who are doing independent analyses of the environmental and economic effects of certain policies.
2
3
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Oh I saw the last administration not give a flip about the actual farmers
Replying to @marwilliamson
Because you and other politicians surround yourself with people who challenge your policies? 😂🙄
Replying to @marwilliamson
@marwilliamson Agricultural production is directly linked to the strategic initiative. It’s important to understand the Chinese communist party has manipulated its currency in an effort to destroy the U.S. economy. In the event of Chinese Civil War, we must be ready to feed China
Replying to @marwilliamson
He has that right. The people can vote him out next year, if they want to. That’s America. Or maybe, some of these conclusions are actually questionable...
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Both parties for 40 yrs: “The kinds of economists involved most intimately with government and financial institutions by and large don’t notice real people in real places—people who may be losing jobs and falling into despondency, addiction, and suicide.” theatlantic.com/magazine/arc…
Replying to @marwilliamson
If they're Obama holdovers, they need to go.