The question that will determine the outcome of the 2020 election isn’t “Who can convince people?” Rather, it’s “Who can inspire people?” Those who fail to recognize the importance of emotional resonance in making a winning political argument overlook factors it will take to win.

Nov 26, 2019 · 11:11 PM UTC

35
73
17
439
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
NO MA'AM, IT'S WHO HAS THE MOST MONEY AND WHO WILL CONTINUE TO KEEP INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AROUND THE WORLD OPPRESSED SO THE WICKED CAN CONTINUE TO RAPE THE LAND. PERIOD
Replying to @marwilliamson
Spot on.
Replying to @marwilliamson
All these Tweets you put out today are really great. It’s nice to see someone actually running for President to help humanity. Truly some inspiring stuff.
3
3
9
Replying to @marwilliamson
What makes you think a seasoned politician cant already achieve a mass resonance? I will say that I dont currently see it anywhere except in Bernies campaign. Its full of energy.
Replying to @marwilliamson
IF u don't get the nom, I hope you will consider supporting the person who puts #HumanityFirst, and is most similar to you in emotional intelligence. @AndrewYang He wants to replace standardized testing with arts and social/emotional learning as top priority in public schools.
Replying to @marwilliamson
MW: Lo q determinará el resultado en elecciones del 2020 no es "Quién puede convencer a la gente?" sino "Quién puede inspirar a la gente?" Quienes no reconocen la importancia de la resonancia emocional en ganar un argumento político, pasan por alto factores necesarios para ganar.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
To be (Trump) or not to be (Trump) that is the question.?!.
Replying to @marwilliamson
A new position at the white house should be spiritual adviser you would be great at that
Replying to @marwilliamson
How about "who will call out government for what it is...a monopoly on force."
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Trump! #MAGA2020
Load more