With two billionaires (both nice people, actually) spending tens of millions of dollars on TV ads, it’s time for Americans to ask whether we think the presidency should be so easily bought. If this assault on our democracy doesn’t call for a non-violent revolution then what does?

Nov 24, 2019 · 4:58 PM UTC

114
296
32
1,591
Replying to @marwilliamson
You don't become a billionaire on accident, it takes some amount of competence and wise leadership to reach that level of success. Money is a reward for providing valuable services to society. The more patriotic billionaires running for office, the better.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Also, media buys shouldn't so expensive!!!!!! Obscene
Replying to @marwilliamson
With all your recent anti-Dem postings, I’m starting to wonder whether the female Russian asset is you and not Tulsi.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Unfortunately money runs ramped in our government this is why so many in congress become multi millionaires they have been bought for votes to highest bidders. Or they rig bids for family members for government jobs
Replying to @marwilliamson
The presidency isn’t “easily” bought. Just ask Hillary Clinton. She spent 770 Million dollars on her campaign. Twice as much as Donald Trump.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Plus an alleged billionaire already in place... (if we had tax returns we'd know for sure...)
Replying to @marwilliamson
You're going to be Amazed about how much the President Trumps Campaign is going to Raised by ind! The Democrats are relying on "The New World Order" money, & Non-Citizen votes! Your "Utopian" message is the Problem! The rest of your Party are going to the "Marxists" dark-side!
Except neither billionaire has a chance in hell of winning, which is still better than your chances.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I’m not voting for any liberal candidates. More concerned about the costly liberal freebie schemes than a billionaire ruining for President.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marry a billionaire.