Being anti-slavery would not of itself have moved the needle for even one slave. It was only those who crossed the psychological, emotional and moral bridge from anti-slavery to abolitionist who made a difference; they went from “I’m against it” to “Not on my watch.”

Oct 21, 2019 · 11:24 PM UTC

38
184
29
814
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
I love Marianne so much. I wish her to be the President of the United States.
Replying to @marwilliamson
💯👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼♥️ You are next level!
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Lol @ those who’d rather change the subject than acknowledge the truth of what Marianne said, the truth about America’s dirty deeds toward AAs. That train is always on time. Y’all hate to have this conversation but it’s being had & I’m so grateful to Marianne for having it. 👏🏾👏🏾
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne have brunch with me and explain Hegel to me PLEASE
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
There was a big war in there too I think
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Auntie Marianne you should read All On Fire, the biography of William Lloyd Garrison
Replying to @marwilliamson
I couldn't agree more, & right now Americans as a whole are #Slaves to the #DuopolyMonopoly and we are now mentally aware and are going to set ourselves free, please join us, we can use intelligent, loving, caring people like yourself
Replying to @marwilliamson
Guess how it was accomplished? Men. With guns. Not hugging and unrealistic idealistic love.
Replying to @marwilliamson
@RodFell THIS is the correct articulation of what would make sense - an abolitionist is waaay different than that non-sensical word, "anti-racist" @BetoORourke uses there. This one makes sense, points out "what action to take" to battle injustice, not what label you "gotta" adopt
2