Being anti-slavery would not of itself have moved the needle for even one slave. It was only those who crossed the psychological, emotional and moral bridge from anti-slavery to abolitionist who made a difference; they went from “I’m against it” to “Not on my watch.”

Oct 21, 2019 · 11:24 PM UTC

38
184
29
813
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne Williamson is leading the American People across the bridge from inequality to equality, from incivility to decency, from injustice to liberty and justice for all. Join the march. Marianne2020.com
7
14
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wonder why abolitionist has failed to this day to free the 30 million plus slaves across Africa, MidEast asia? Slaveholders are overwhelmingly ppl of color and Muslim. That is 7x the number of slaves in USA in 1860 at start of festivities
Replying to @marwilliamson
For all matters & practices that undermine our Constitution & our democratic system of government, we MUST not only go from “I’m against it” to “Not on my watch;” We must proactively proclaim what that we are FOR life, liberty, justice & human rights equally for all
1
6
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, everyone of us has several slaves in our bloodline. We are all happy it’s pretty much over - except North Africa of course... Is it possible you could comment on things that are not so obvious?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Thank you @marwilliamson for keeping this a top issue in the face of opposition. #ADOS #WilliamsonRising @cjcampbell411 @CarletteHarris1
1
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not exactly our most pressing problem on the cusp of 2020. America has REAL problems now — and if they continue to be ignored, or supplemented by philosophical reviews of the past, NONE of us will have a country left. It’s that simple. Let’s wake up, folks!!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Same with abortion.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well no shit.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well, the abolitionists succeeded. There has been no slavery in the U.S. for 150 years. At some point, would it be appropriate to consider the question "Now can we just move on?" Are we still going to be listening to this rhetoric in another 150 years?