I didn’t expect such an aggressive conversation with @AC360 but I figure it’s good rehearsal for debating Donald Trump.

Aug 2, 2019 · 2:05 AM UTC

653
211
85
2,885
Replying to @marwilliamson @AC360
You're running for president and you've made a lot of disturbing statements about health care, faith and science. I would be disappointed if you weren't aggressively questioned about them, because those positions make it hard for a lot of Democrats to consider supporting you.
9
9
1
196
Fine! Ask a question, but then let me answer...
45
13
4
266
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson @AC360
Please cut ties with Scientology and antivaxers
5
7
I have no ties with either.
6
5
154
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson @AC360
He should have just gone ahead and interviewed himself.
10
7
1
107
Replying to @marwilliamson
Totally...you were the mature on Marianne! 👏👏 I experienced @AC360 as pretty triggered...not centered, reactive, not listening, talking over...not his usual skillful self. Had his point to make.Sending him love. Not hisself. Now must research his ADVERTISERS! Big pharma huh?
2
1
16
Replying to @marwilliamson @AC360
Anderson quoted you directly. There was nothing to do but acknowledge you said anti-depressants "numb" people. You could say this notion about the drugs is very popular and you regurgitated it without much thought. Or that it may be true and should be studied
Replying to @marwilliamson @AC360
You did great
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @AC360
Your 15 minutes are up sweetie… Move on.
Replying to @marwilliamson
marianne! flip these attacks back & assert you are the most pro-science bc you’re based in the quantum paradigm. you mentioned it on chapo & i think it could help you bc ppl are so intent on misunderstanding you based on their outdated materialist reductionist cosmologies.
1
1
Load more