Tip for you:
If you disagree with someone refute their statements with sensible argument, evidence, REASON...
Don't just reel off some faux-spiritual, abstract, assumed nonsense about the person's character which reveals 100% that you are defending a belief system/ego contsruct
2
You give me nothing substantive to refute. Love for humanity should be the epicenter of policy — do you agree?
2
1
Love for humanity should be the epicenter of policy
...Of course. Who would refute that?
The problem is that love for humanity cannot be served while the evil, lazy and corrupt are rewarded and treated equally to those who work hard and are decent. A fact of life you're missing.
1
In this instance you are in support of the lazy and corrupt being given special treatment above and off the backs of decent people... albeit because you don't know the truth of the matter. But how does that serve humanity?
1
What school of spritual philosophy teaches to exact financial revenge for somethjng you have little to know understanding of that occured generations before that will only make beggars and entitled brats of people? I'd love to hear it...
1
It’s a new concept and philosophy and it’s American 🇺🇸 we rebuilt our adversaries after WWII, apologized to Japanese-American interment by giving them $20k each, and we are going to follow through on reparations in the future.
2
There is no “other side” on the subject of slavery.
Jul 16, 2019 · 8:18 AM UTC
2
5
9


