This is exactly what’s wrong with America & why nothing ever changes. With due respect, the Founders didn’t assign the Chuck Todds of the world to be a group of gatekeepers who get to tell the rest of us who’s “worthy” of being heard by the American people breitbart.com/politics/2019/…

May 24, 2019 · 6:07 PM UTC

125
214
43
659
Chuck Todd doesn't deserve coverage at all.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Chuck Todd is so dispicable & was clearly complicit in 2016 & beyond. I have zero doubt he's being blackmailed by Trump, Epstein, or 1 of their nasty perv cronies. Soledad admitted there's men in the MSM Kompromised a while back then quickly deleted it🙄
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hi @chucktodd - YOUR gatekeeping media incessantly promoted trump in 2016 and is partially responsible for his election. Y’all are doing the same thing now. Even bad publicity is good, in this case. Worthy? Who appointed you? And @BreitbartNews, @marwilliamson qualified.
3
19
52
Replying to @marwilliamson
Proper pluralization would be Chuck's Todd.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Have you been reading Breitbart? Do you consider it a reliable source in general? Are you using their reference this time because it supports your assertion?
2
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
✌🏿the founders✌🏿 not only advocated for chattel slavery but many themselves owned slaves. no need to cite or point to "the founders" as somehow credible sources to make your point valid.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I think you have great things to say about spiritual issues, which is why I follow you. However, because you've never held any type of government office is a huge strike in my book. I feel the same about Trump and the Starbuck guy.
5
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Regarding your wish to be the Leader of the Free World and Commander in Chief, its an anathema to many in the West to elect someone who is a minister or spiritual leader in a secular society.
2
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
That is just some crazy, backwards, corporate nonsense! It is exactly the problem with the media coverage in politics.
1
9