When 1% of the population owns more wealth than the bottom 90%, it’s an imbalance that nature will not support. One way or the other - either peacefully or painfully - society will re-establish equilibrium. We can wisely choose a greater balance or it will be chosen for us.

Apr 20, 2019 · 6:04 AM UTC

61
369
32
1,376
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Is a violent uprising possible in the USA”. Before you say no, realize that:(1) Before the French Revolution, no one thought the aristocracy could fall. (2) No one believed the Soviet Union could could collapse so soon. Etc. Many examples where no one thought it possible.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
People are also subject to the rules and laws of nature. That is why gravity will knock you down to ground when you fall. The 90% sustains the 1% and when the 90% is out of cash so is the 1%.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Exactly, revolutions don’t have to be battlefields.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nature has nothing to do with it. Unless you are talking about human nature, and wanting to turn the USA into a Socialist country.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sounds like a mind set issue
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Growing disparities in wealth call for some balancing acts.
1
2
It's amazing how our democratic representation is in shambles in this information age.
1
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hey whatever happened to Occupy Wall Street? theguardian.com/commentisfre…
1
1
2
Whaterver we do not intensionally work on will eventually work on us with intensified purpose to draw us nearer to love.
3