When 1% of the population owns more wealth than the bottom 90%, it’s an imbalance that nature will not support. One way or the other - either peacefully or painfully - society will re-establish equilibrium. We can wisely choose a greater balance or it will be chosen for us.

Apr 20, 2019 · 6:04 AM UTC

61
369
32
1,376
Replying to @marwilliamson
It is wrong, Marianne, yet there is no discernable tendency to equality of wealth. Everything I've read recently points toward the 1% increasing their share. For a variety of reasons I cannot see things changing.
Replying to @marwilliamson
My sentiments for upwards of 40 years now.
Replying to @marwilliamson
That’s sad to see you’ve gone full blown communist.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Very true.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The system of imbalance & control creates monsters of us, because there is too much fear; desperation, limitation/survival mentality, greed & violence... The whole system as it is, NEEDS TO CHANGE. Esp the monetary system that most people are conditioned to revere, above life.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Humanity can collectively solve this compassionately & fairly. Ratio is key. Start with a sustainable mean based on holistic wellbeing of both individual & collective. That's 1:1. World vote to set lifestyle range. I'd propose 10:1 (benefactor max) to 1:10 (detractor min). ❤
Replying to @marwilliamson
Equilibrium? Tell us what you think equilibrium is. You are a fraud.