Only if the Mueller report is released in full, without redactions, will full transparency have occurred. Without that transparency the underlying questions will linger. For the American people to be served, it must be released in full. google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes…

Mar 29, 2019 · 10:04 PM UTC

20
63
5
186
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hopefully they will release as much as they can. Obviously we will never see 100% of it because there will be parts that are considered classified for national security that will be redacted. But that is norm and to be expected.
1
Actually, in this case we should not see it as the norm, or something to be expected. We saw all of the Ken Starr report on Clinton and we should see all of this one too.
3
2
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
given the nature of some of the evidence collection process involved, surveillance of individuals, we can be pretty certain that there will be redactions. your bar is unreasonably high given what we know to be the context here.
Replying to @marwilliamson
He can't release the whole thing its ILLEGAL, what part of this do you not understand. Yeah we want you as our president
Replying to @marwilliamson
ANY redaction is an insult to our intelligence and values as a nation. Redaction indicates they have something to hide. Anything they release will simply be more Trump Administration hogwash and we must impress on them that we will never stop until we get THE ENTIRE REPORT.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
I hardly think you are interested in the American people. We all know it was a witch hunt. The bias hatred of liberals is transparent for all Americans to see.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Will not be released fully until grand jury's are done sweeheart.
Replying to @marwilliamson
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson @Bellatrixx2020
Barr wants to protect the trump crime family.
Replying to @marwilliamson @Bellatrixx2020
Does anyone believe Barr has the ONLY copy?... I don’t!...
Load more