We can question the behavior of Israel without joining forces with those who would destroy it. That is the balance most needed now: to take on the conversation in a way that honors both human rights of Palestinians as well as legitimate security concerns of Israel. Both matter.

Mar 5, 2019 · 2:14 PM UTC

18
27
22
149
Replying to @marwilliamson
0/ K, So help me to understand~We Live in an Empirical Regime, Presided by a Tyrannical Buffoon and You want us who are oppressed to offer our empathy to a Nation just as oppressed than we are?! It's gonna take an "Act of Providence" Heavenly Forces WILL Correct This, NOT Humans!
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
This might work if Palestinians wanted to live in peace with the Israelis, but they do not. They simply do not want peace.
3
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
I like you masquerade as a voice for freedom while defending apartheid.
11
Replying to @marwilliamson
3
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Making an imbalanced situation appear equal perpetuates the harm of oppression.
1
13
Replying to @marwilliamson
I agree. But this is going to be a tricky one to balance.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Be absolutely for real, Marianne. Stop pretending like “legitimate security concerns of Israel” is a phrase that does anything other than defend an Apartheid state and their attempt at a violent systemic erasure of Palestinian people. 🇵🇸 🇵🇸
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
So-called centralism and neutrality on this matter does nothing but support genocide
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
yes. We all import
Replying to @marwilliamson
Meanwhile 45 insists that any criticism of his agenda is anti American, as he genuflects to the anti democratic autocrats of the world-as if abusing human rights is the defining mark of a "great" leader. Thank God I haven't married my identity to his histrionic ravings/policies.
1
Load more