When someone starts having less success attacking a message, they start to attack the messenger - especially if she's a woman. Elizabeth "unlikable," Alexandrea "crazy girl" & on & on. It only worked when we didn't see it for what it is, but now we do! It will not work this time.

Jan 6, 2019 · 5:14 PM UTC

51
274
17
1,581
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is always the possibility that she has no clue what she is talking about. I have noticed you have a hard time with criticizing liberal women when it is needed. I am so glad this young lady is getting so much air time. The more she speaks the better
1
3
Tell me one thing where she hasn’t known what she was talking about, Danny?
1
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
Double standards will cease to be the issue! Progress is at hand! Lady up, let's remember, earth is female! Cyber cheers!
1
1
18
“Lady up.” Love that!
16
Replying to @marwilliamson
If only MSM would get the message. 😡
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
If we find ourselves projecting negative interpretations into positive messages, on a regular on-going basis, it might be time to step back, take a long, hard, and honest look at ourselves, so we can see where the negativity really resides.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hallelujah! It's a new hour!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You need take another look at who is doing the attacking.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
What needs to be attacked is the SYSTEM that attacks the messenger. The propaganda machines that distort reality with opinions. We can do that through actual studies. One example: immigration. Media never mentions that up to 40% fly over the wall. vimeo.com/182752065
1
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Another brilliant observation from the insightful and highly knowledgeable Marianne Williamson.
2
8
Load more