Sometimes a platitude needs challenging, such as the idea that you should never think about something negative because what you think about expands. In truth, it’s often the negative that we DON’T think about that expands ... for the very reason that we didn’t think about it!

Jul 11, 2018 · 12:02 AM UTC

26
47
214
Replying to @marwilliamson
What we resist persists. Having thoughts doesn’t mean we are our thoughts. Spiritual practice like meditation has allow me to understand this on a level beyond logic. I find the practice is important to continue. The ego and external evils don’t stop with their practices.
1
No, sometimes what we resist dissolves. If the Allies had not resisted Hitler, Hitler would have won the war. It is true that we create what we defend against, but I think it’s important not to misuse that principal to justify complacency.
1
2
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
The psyche requires a connection across the cathode and the anode of its physical interface if the current, the present, is to flow as the ode that is the code of love.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Maybe it’s a numbers game. If more are thinking of a positive result for a negative situation than those focused on purely the negative situation. Positive results ensue. Just a thought.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I have great respect for your work but trying to account for the evils of other people’s consciousness & what they are looking to create is futile, draining & soul burdening. The best focus is always on love and leaving each person we meet more uplifted than before they met us.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Oh stop.
Replying to @marwilliamson
As long as when we are contemplating the negative, we are also contemplating what we might be able to do about it
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Oof. Those metaphysics. Turn me right upside over.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Apropos platitudes: This judge Kavanaugh named by #45 holds #potus in a position as King essentially? His view needs challenging -- potus is NOT above th law. This platitude of itself is corrupt per se.
Mentor•In•Ca @mentorinca
10 Jul 2018
Replying to @Acosta
Respectfully, I'd oppose. 1. Having a corrupt or ill-intentioned individual occupying that office, & 2. Enabling corrupt intentions/actions upon th country by not keeping faith to its own principles of justice, etc., in permitting 1 to be above the law is in itself corrupt!
Replying to @marwilliamson
That was a double read for me. 💖
Load more