Candidate for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.

Joined February 2009
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
.@POTUS should move beyond “climate change is an existential threat” to “climate change is a national emergency” - and act accordingly.
78
258
27
1,619
I respect the voters! But I do not respect the millions of dollars in dark money that was used so effectively to persuade them that Nina is someone who she is not.
1
15
2/Everything Washington & Adams warned us about is coming true: People putting a party before their country. Thinking Nina should line up behind Biden all the time is no different than GOP’s lining up behind Trump all the time. She alienates the elite but millions of us love her.
2
1
23
1/ “Corporatists” does not belong with the other code phrases you mentioned. It is a meaningful term to describe those who put a corporate agenda before the health and well-being of people and planet, but it has nothing to do with the Jews (plus Jews saying so is a bad thing).
2
1
40
No way - and my nerve endings are antenna for anti-Semitism too. No it has not been “going on for generations” that “corporatists” is code for “Jews.” Nor is it now. I know her personally and she is NOT an anti-Semite.
3
4
1
95
“Politicians continue to be in at best a state of denial, and at worse actively conspiring to conceal how dire our situation is.” inews.co.uk/opinion/ipcc-rep…
11
44
158
Replying to @_sapphicarus
Capitalism is not a light switch you can just turn off. We need to think in terms of transformational not just transactional change.
1
5
Replying to @ErikReisz
Yes, but at this point it’s beyond just campaign finance reform. We need a constitutional amendment to establish public funding for federal campaigns.
2
Replying to @penninepowerhse
Actually, yes. Because it means subsidizing the green energy that would make that possible.
2
8
Replying to @_sapphicarus
You subsidize the earth by subsidizing the development of green energy.
1
10
Every year we subsidize fossil fuel companies to the tune of tens of billions of dollars. Imagine if instead we had subsidized the earth.
35
139
11
841
That’s not what went wrong in 2000.
2
But it’s not like a light switch you can turn on or off. The change isn’t transactional but transformational.
2
5
On climate change, both parties failed us. One gets an F. One gets a D+. #CouldaHadAlGore
65
64
9
682
Replying to @northstarbruno
Do you realize what we’re facing? You speak as though we have a choice.
2
2
Replying to @HeidiBriones
Several hundred billion times over.
6
By Narendra_17 on Reddit
5
5
126