Candidate for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.

Joined February 2009
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
No I did not. EVER. And that’s my point.
1
56
I’m not saying that YOU do. But I don’t understand why you’re saying this “isn’t the best way forward.” Don’t we just have to tell the truth as we see it at some point? I don’t see where coddling one’s Congressional leadership is somehow a “better strategy.” This is a democracy!
1
12
But that’s my point!! Progressives like Ro Khanna and Tim Ryan were asking for the $2000 a month from the beginning, but those proposals were squashed by leadership. And what the Speaker says is what Americans hear.
7
Sometimes what you call “nuance” is used to obfuscate the bigger picture. And that does not help us; it just maintains the status quo. Until there is a progressive Spesker this will not change.
2
19
Replying to @Kaiwhakamarie
It’s not about them. I’m talking about us.
1
And I’m reminded of a codependent relationship where someone doesn’t show up for us and we stay in denial or keep making excuses for them! It doesn’t serve us and it doesn’t serve them.
3
2
53
Replying to @WillLeftridge
This entire time the Dem leadership could’ve been saying to the American people “$2000 a month $2000 a month $2000 a month.” There is a bully pulpit there and no, it was not used for that purpose. I don’t understand the codependent relationship so many Dems have with the Speaker.
3
3
1
9
No they did not. The HEROES Act included a proposal for a second round of direct payments to Americans – $1,200 for an individual, $2,400 for joint filers, and $1,200 for up to three dependents.
5
4
63
Replying to @AllTheWayToDC
“The HEROES Act included a proposal for a second round of direct payments to Americans – $1,200 for an individual, $2,400 for joint filers, and $1,200 for up to three dependents. This one-time infusion of cash would provide relief to many Americans.”
1
1
4
Replying to @ThomasJPaterson
It did not call for $2000 a month going forward.
1
3
Now even Perdue and Loeffler are supporting the $2000 stimulus because they see it’s what voters want. If the Democratic Party had stood loud and proud for it starting in March, Democrats would easily be controlling both House and Senate today.
269
901
104
6,717
Replying to @sarahclazarus
This is a powerful picture and more beautiful than you might realize.
20
25
9
2,765
Replying to @corndudemax
Because they wanted you to.
6
3
144
I like to think my entire career is a response to this. But I hear you.
13
Replying to @TimFVB @davidsirota
No! We have to lift each other up when somebody says that. That’s how they want us to feel. We have to love this country and love our ancestors and love our descendants so much that we commit to changing it.
1
7
Welcome to presidential Inaugurations, funded by Boeing, Bank of America, etc - all of whom “look forward to engaging with the administration on a variety of issues.” Oh I bet they do... nytimes.com/2020/12/16/us/po…
49
139
17
740
There’s a big difference between leading and ruling.
1
1