earlier replies
A fucked 7.5 ISO image and now this. Who runs QA inside @redhat?
1
Not wanting to bitch, but there is a drop in standards that needs to be addressed.
1
@redhat Why are we not moving to @firefox 60 esr, please tell us?
1
Took gcc, libvirt, kvm and some gome updates etc. - no firefox. This is piss poor @redhat!
1
Cancel @firefox 52.8.0 and give us 60 esr please!
1
@redhat QA and release management - See image.
1
FYI that sreenshot is for the supposed aged 52.8.0 @firefox update.
1
A further update attempt went wrong architecture or could if I was not paying attention. pastebin.centos.org/766706/
1
Key lines to look for: ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:52.7.3-1.el7_5 will be updated ---> Package firefox.i686 0:52.8.0-1.el7_5 will be an update
1
Those who DM'd that 60 is a week old. No... 60 was branched/beta over a month ago. As a key desktop component @redhat should be building and testing it daily. The day release comes they should be ready to take a release tar ball with maybe the odd patch push to users.

May 14, 2018 路 3:58 PM UTC

1
Remember this is not just a major feature update, but a security update. We should get the latest. @redhat have let users down again.