Seems @redhat are putting out update announcements out now before the actual updates are on server. Two updates runs with no updates offered. Oh... and thanks for chickening out and giving us @firefox 52.8.0 when we all want 60 esr. 馃槙
1
A fucked 7.5 ISO image and now this. Who runs QA inside @redhat?
1
Not wanting to bitch, but there is a drop in standards that needs to be addressed.
1
@redhat Why are we not moving to @firefox 60 esr, please tell us?
1
Took gcc, libvirt, kvm and some gome updates etc. - no firefox. This is piss poor @redhat!
1
Cancel @firefox 52.8.0 and give us 60 esr please!
1
@redhat QA and release management - See image.
1
FYI that sreenshot is for the supposed aged 52.8.0 @firefox update.
1
A further update attempt went wrong architecture or could if I was not paying attention. pastebin.centos.org/766706/
1
Key lines to look for: ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:52.7.3-1.el7_5 will be updated ---> Package firefox.i686 0:52.8.0-1.el7_5 will be an update

May 14, 2018 路 3:28 PM UTC

1
This tweet is unavailable
Those who DM'd that 60 is a week old. No... 60 was branched/beta over a month ago. As a key desktop component @redhat should be building and testing it daily. The day release comes they should be ready to take a release tar ball with maybe the odd patch push to users.
1
Remember this is not just a major feature update, but a security update. We should get the latest. @redhat have let users down again.
The mere fact I had this on a so called enterprise distro is disturbing!