Seems @redhat are putting out update announcements out now before the actual updates are on server. Two updates runs with no updates offered. Oh... and thanks for chickening out and giving us @firefox 52.8.0 when we all want 60 esr. 馃槙
1
A fucked 7.5 ISO image and now this. Who runs QA inside @redhat?

May 14, 2018 路 2:20 PM UTC

1
Not wanting to bitch, but there is a drop in standards that needs to be addressed.
1
@redhat Why are we not moving to @firefox 60 esr, please tell us?
1
Took gcc, libvirt, kvm and some gome updates etc. - no firefox. This is piss poor @redhat!
1
Cancel @firefox 52.8.0 and give us 60 esr please!
1
@redhat QA and release management - See image.
1
FYI that sreenshot is for the supposed aged 52.8.0 @firefox update.
1
A further update attempt went wrong architecture or could if I was not paying attention. pastebin.centos.org/766706/
1
Key lines to look for: ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:52.7.3-1.el7_5 will be updated ---> Package firefox.i686 0:52.8.0-1.el7_5 will be an update
1