I can't decide if a *Norton* router with a yearly subscription to protect against rogue IoT is bad, or even worse theverge.com/2017/1/3/141246…

Jan 15, 2017 · 8:01 PM UTC

27
69
13
183
Load newest
Replying to @internetofshit @verge
It's Symantec - worse than worse.
Replying to @internetofshit
All I've found Norton products to do is slow your machine down to unusable, so not hopeful :(
1
Replying to @internetofshit
looks like the evil computer from Demon Seed. Hell NOPE.
Replying to @internetofshit
think they're getting confused about WiFi "2.5Gbps of bandwidth"
Replying to @internetofshit
Norton, as in Symantec? No, thank you.
Replying to @internetofshit
The article reads like a re-written press release, which it probably was
Replying to @internetofshit
A few proton torpedoes at those and the whole shield generator goes down, leaving your destroyer open to attack.
Replying to @internetofshit @verge
We already know how "well" some devices respond to loss of connectivity, I can just imagine the fun when false positive quarantines occur.
Replying to @internetofshit
from symantec... The company that protected the New York Times. Not.
Replying to @internetofshit
Anything with Norton on it is bad.
2
Load more