Replying to @internetofshit
"This is a beta, and the purpose of a beta is to continue ironing out wrinkles." - These are not WRINKLES - AP/FSD consistently fails simple scenarios-WRINKLES are when most daily scenarios work for all 750k cars for a year & legitimate edge cases hit-imispgh.medium.com/tesla-ful…
1
Replying to @internetofshit
This post makes you look like an idiot. No stats on how current autopilot is safer then with a human driving. No mention on how it was released to people who have recorded the safest driving in their teslas. Just simply bashing new tech cause you're uncomfortable. Grow up 🙄
2
Replying to @internetofshit
Make them do all their testing in the City of San Francisco.
2
Replying to @internetofshit
Same way you opt out of someone driving drunk, on their phone or who likes to speed.
2
3
Replying to @internetofshit
Wait til Al-Quaeda or whoever, hacks a self-driving car to deliver a trunkload of explosives or perhaps to drive through a city street at rush hour, releasing nerve gas...
2
Replying to @internetofshit
Would you like to opt out of driving on any road ever? Roads are incredible dangerous at the moment due to human error. This beta will speed up the process of FSD becoming better at driving than humans. The quicker that happens, the less people die from RTC.
3
Replying to @internetofshit
I don't know, there's two NTSB reports calling for autopilot to be fixed or recalled, but NHTSA has done absolutely nothing about it. This company is above the law, write you congressman.
1
4
These cars will end being used for a massive cyber-terrorist attack killing hundred thousands, if not millions. The question is not even if this will happen one day, but when. Cyber-Chaos cannot be stopped under current digital systems and cyberspace architecture paradigms.
1
3
Replying to @internetofshit
I continue to be appalled that governments are allowing this deadly junk on public roads.
1
2
Replying to @internetofshit
Move to the Midwest, where everyone is too poor to afford Teslas.
1
16