Car makers are now retroactively realizing they can charge a subscription fee for features and calling previous access a "trial" nitter.vloup.ch/drgitlin/status/…

Aug 11, 2020 · 6:40 PM UTC

24
254
18
747
Replying to @internetofshit
Been doing it for years. I’ve been refusing to pay to update onboard nav systems for at least a decade.
Replying to @internetofshit
This is why putting a cell phone in every car is a horrible mistake.
1
1
Replying to @internetofshit
I feel like there's a market out there for a no-frills, easy to work on, economic vehicle that promises never to have crap like that. No crazy computer stuff, no services, no updates. Just a car. But then I'm a Linux user.
4
3
48
Replying to @internetofshit
Would be real nice if the car manufacturers start to rent-seek themselves out of business and we can finally get some decent, uncomplicated public transit in this country.
2
21
Replying to @internetofshit
Ford realized they could do that shortly after they launched FordPass, then realized later that nobody would be willing to pay for it because it has almost no actual value.
1
2
Replying to @internetofshit
It's not retroactive. It was in the disclosures and window sticker.
Replying to @internetofshit
What happens when someone dies because of a glitch that removes the feature while driving? Also, I believe that all cars should be air gapped for anything other than their entertainment systems for safety. (Air-gapping the radio is silly)
1
1
Replying to @internetofshit
i saw an ad for a buick that boldly advertised the remote internet start thing on their car but the tiny text said you only got a month free and then you'd have to pay
Replying to @internetofshit
knew it, there had to be a catch for how crazy 2020 chassis have been looking lately
Replying to @internetofshit
Remote start on Hyundai is subscription based.
2