We've created an AI system that can summarize books. Matches the quality of human-written summaries 5% of the time, and there's lots of room to improve from here. One step towards building AI systems that can reliably perform tasks that are hard for humans to even evaluate.
We want our AI systems to be aligned with human intentions. This is especially important as tasks get more difficult to evaluate. To develop techniques to address this problem, we trained a model to summarize books. openai.com/blog/summarizing-…

Sep 23, 2021 · 6:53 PM UTC

24
39
7
379
Replying to @gdb
The summary mechanism is based on Munteanu reasoning mechanism. And can be viewed as shortest path of logical correlations from beginning of the book or other types of information to the end. Visual example here vk.com/id298438704
Replying to @gdb
OpenAi has not mentioned that the summary mechanism is based on Munteanu reasoning method . There is nothing complex just representing an map of words asociations like buildings on a map of a town then traversing the sortest path. explanation here vk.com/id298438704
Replying to @gdb @Dominic2306
I can understand why we might want AI to automate boring tasks to release our creativity to read and review books. Once we have an AI that reads and reviews them the next step is an AI to write them. Would anyone want to read these? Would there be anyone left to read them?