This is not acceptable, #Rcpp (Thanks to the #dplyr team to put a pin on this)
4
3
Replying to @romain_francois
a) Team #Rcpp has nothing to do with it. b) dplyr decided to mark versions, never coordinated with us - talk to them. c) Not needed AFAICT.

Jul 1, 2017 · 5:33 PM UTC

3
5
Replying to @eddelbuettel
a) the way packages are expected to use the library of Rcpp is responsible for this.
Replying to @eddelbuettel
b) #dplyr just warns about it. That’s a good thing.
Replying to @eddelbuettel
c) you C’tT because the symptoms are not obvious and not easily reproducible