More on ranking CRAN packages by counts of reverse Depends: and this time with source code goo.gl/fE7mj #rstats #rcpp

Aug 17, 2012 · 3:10 AM UTC

2
1
3
@mt_morgan @jmw86069 That's why I posted source code :)
1
more replies
Replying to @eddelbuettel
@eddelbuettel nicely done. Any reason you didn't include Bioconductor packages? They have surprisingly high counts, I was surprised anyway.
1
Because BioC does not provides an .rds file MT @jmw86069 "@eddelbuettel nicely done. Any reason you didn't include Bioconductor packages?"
Replying to @eddelbuettel
@eddelbuettel Well done, of course.
1