They already have the semi-intrusive questioning because of travel and the 'sex with men who... or sex with someone who had sex with men who...' stuff. Surely it'd be better to simply make it clear what kinds of infections they fear from men-who-have-sex-with-men?
What I find irritating is that it excludes all stable monogamous sexual partnerships between two healthy men, and yet entirely permits sexually promiscuous heterosexual men who frankly are more of a risk.
Righty, I've finished the work, and reviewing it again. With the help of @pietroalbini I've migrated rustup (@rustlang installer) from Travis/Appveyor to github actions.
Good morning everyone. Day two of my @rustlang / rustup focus will be primarily spent trying to find any kind of official github action for aws/s3 because it seems near impossible :/
Nearing the end of day one of a @rustlang / rustup focus and I got my issue/PR backlog cleared, wrote the patch for installer confusion (PR is pending me deciding if I can usefully CI test it)
And I've started writing github actions workflows for Rustup.
Today is "Back to the grindstone" but for Rustup (the install for @rustlang) rather than for my paying job :D
On the docket for the day -- clear my backlog of issues/PR reviews, and submit a patch for a nasty confusion caused by i686 installers on x86_64 systems.
Advice: it is essential for all time that you write the date in the form 'YYYY-MM-DD' so that it is unambiguous and not vulnerable to digit addon attack. Also it sorts nicely.