Okay, so, is a *bad* localisation pack better or worse than *no* localisation pack? If your native tongue is 'en' think outside the box.
15% No localisation 4EVA
31% No l10n better than bad
54% Any l10n better than none
13 votes β€’ Final results
2
1
Define "bad" - incomplete? non-idiomatic? hard to understand? actively wrong?
1
Replying to @ersatzmaus
All but the last one. I think actively wrong is a different classification all together.

Jun 22, 2017 Β· 4:30 PM UTC

1
Replying to @dsilverstone
Then I'd say it depends on how far the target locale is from en and how likely the users are to be able to read/understand latin script.