@dsilverstone @frabcus etc. etc. etc. Just think "I want a jury trial which reveals my identify if the result is GUILTY" but otherwise Anon.
1
@leashless @dsilverstone politically, who/what instigates the trial? and won't other evidence reveal the identity?
2
@frabcus @leashless I'm unsure that a bi-(or tri-)directional quorum can be achieved using gfshare. I will need to ponder.
1
@dsilverstone @frabcus You only need one direction - guilty. All other outcomes? Not guilty :-) Easy enough.
1
@leashless @frabcus gfshare uses all inputs. So you risk leaking who voted which way. If that is not a problem then we may have something.
1
@dsilverstone @frabcus Clearly separation of powers is going to be needed - shares handed out by one hand, counted by another type of thing
1
@leashless @frabcus I'm getting a tad lost now :-) I think it'd have to be a round-table -- perhaps on IRC -- to get this right in my head.
5
@dsilverstone @frabcus If it is, in your opinion, return "guilty share" otherwise, return random block. Result at end is either ID or not.
1
@leashless @frabcus gfshare can't do that because it *has* to trust the entire set of shares given to it. We *could* try the N subsets.
2
@dsilverstone @frabcus Wait, what's the behavior on a bum share - surely it just doesn't return the original? You get a failure?
1
@leashless @frabcus On a bum share, you get random crap. gfshare you either get exactly what you wanted, or exactly nothing of use.
Jun 14, 2013 ยท 9:30 AM UTC
1