Leap second news! A new Bulletin D from the IERS just dropped into my inbox As expected, DUT1 has increased from -0.2s to -0.1s (no link because the IERS have not updated their website yet)
Replying to @fanf
Bulletin A has high-precision values for UT1-UTC for the next year, which are projected to increase past -0.15 seconds at the start of July 2021-06-30 -0.15044 2021-07-01 -0.14964 DUT1 is currently -0.2 so it should increase to -0.1 around then
1
3
1
7
A brief refresher on terminology: DUT1 is the difference between UTC (standard time from atomic clocks) and UT1 (the time judged by earth rotation) DUT1 is accurate to 0.1 second when DUT1 gets near +1 or -1, UTC gets a leap second to keep it close to UT1
1
1
oops, a correction: Bulletin D is promulgated in advance, so the actual change to DUT1 will be from the 17th July
1
in a week or two I expect to receive a copy of Bulletin C from the IERS, which will announce that there will be no leap second at the end of this year
1
normally DUT1 gets more and more negative until a positive leap second brings it back above zero things are super weird at the moment, the earth is spinning slightly faster than usual, so DUT1 is creeping UP instead of DOWN
2
4
the IERS bulletins page is iers.org/IERS/EN/Publication… but it doesn't yet have the latest Bulletin D nor (of course) the next Bulletin C
1
when things aren't super weird, the earth takes a little bit longer than 24*60*60 seconds to rotate, typically about 1 millisecond more, though it varies unpredictably
1
1
at the moment the earth is weirdly rotating 250 Β΅s less than 24*60*60 seconds it is slowing down slightly, tho: last month the difference was 260 Β΅s so the risk of an unprecedented negative leap second is slightly less
2
1
1
Replying to @fanf
<predictable question> Is the huge number of falcon launches recently related at all?

Jun 29, 2021 Β· 1:05 PM UTC

1
Replying to @dsilverstone
heh no more likely to be climate-related
1