Engineer on @googlechrome. Involved in CSS and W3C standards. Previously @mozilla, @w3ctag. Mastodon: @dbaron@w3c.social

Rockville, Maryland, USA
Joined March 2008
L. David Baron @dbaron@w3c.social retweeted
Data channel SDP changes are about to break #WebRTC interop. Better test your interop with Firefox Nightly now. blog.mozilla.org/webrtc/how-…
2
10
1
17
Replying to @khuey_
Replying to @mattyglesias
Imagine a world in which the "caravan" had arrived in San Ysidro every bit as big, or bigger, as it had arrived in Mexico. Then imagine a world where the caravan didn't happen bc there was _no need to offer extra security to migrants to protect them from MEX enforcement._
Yes, that was openly discussed in github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/… where this was added to the spec, including in the initial comment.
2
I think the 1vw in @Litherum's answer should be changed to something in a different length unit (maybe px or em) to get variation as a function of viewport width. (Exactly what length is the interesting part... might need a more complicated expression too!)
2
2
The resolution to do this was from 2014 (or maybe earlier; we resolved to do it multiple times before the spec was edited), but the spec changes were actually made recently in github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/… .
2
Spec changes for this were recently made in github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/… . I don't actually see a bug on file for implementing this in Firefox, but if we don't have one already there should probably be one.
3
I can't think of a workaround, though that doesn't mean there isn't one. It requires that we implement the spec resolution in bugzil.la/1423746 The issue here is really that Firefox is one spec resolution behind, and a bunch of other browsers are two behind.
1
We non-Europeans would need to add an hour for the queue at the border, though. At least, my layovers at Heathrow are usually because I'm going been the USA and somewhere in Europe that's not the British Isles, which don't otherwise require crossing the normal UK border control.
1
Replying to @davidbaron @potch
(a very different thing, of course, but it's called JavaScript Style Sheets)
3
L. David Baron @dbaron@w3c.social retweeted
Federal safety regulators like @NHTSAgov and @NTSB have known for years that SUVs were killing pedestrians at an alarming rate. Instead of using their authority to help vulnerable people, these groups scolded and blamed them. freep.com/story/money/cars/2…
9
170
20
200
L. David Baron @dbaron@w3c.social retweeted
It really is remarkable how undemocratic American political institutions are. Republicans have only won the popular vote once since the 1988 presidential election and now they'll control the Supreme Court for a generation
297
2,678
191
7,588
Replying to @ciphercoffee
Ah, I'd forgotten that pref was for FIDO.
Reminder: the last time the US Supreme Court had a majority of justices appointed by Democratic presidents was just before the resignation of Abe Fortas on May 14, 1969, over 49 years ago.
BREAKING: Justice Anthony Kennedy Is Retiring From The Supreme Court buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/ju…
4
Replying to @ciphercoffee
Will it work sometime soon without flipping a pref?
1
L. David Baron @dbaron@w3c.social retweeted
I never thought I would live to see a day when the Supreme Court of the United States would again make a decision as inhumane as Dred Scott v. Sandford or Korematsu v. United States. #StandWithMuslims #NoMuslimBanEver
1,617
24,777
1,036
69,830
That said, I think RCV is better than first-past-the-post (plurality) or having a separate runoff election of the top two. However, I'd prefer approval voting over RCV.
2
Because the next-to-last round is Breed (34649) - Kim (26805) - Leno (23629), the final round with that set of votes (election day only) is Breed-Kim, and Breed wins the RCV algorithm. But I think that's just by luck and not because she did better in the next-to-last round.
1
Another interesting tidbit looking at only Election Day votes: The three most likely final rounds would have been: - Breed (40949) defeats Kim (40024) - Kim (36121) defeats Leno (35400) - Leno (42882) defeats Breed (39454)
1
Replying to @MikeHommey @heycam
I remember hearing zool/XUL and zippy/XPI in the Netscape days, but never heard zibble/XBL until recently except maybe as a joke pronunciation.
1