I'm starting to wonder if social networking sites (@facebook, @Twitter) and search sites (@Google) of today are similar to web browser engines around 2003 (?) or so, around when use-after-free had just been demonstrated to be a reliable security exploit.
If you work at a social media platform and you're not spending most of your day agitating for internal reform—on so many fronts—what are you doing?
1
1
5
Around this time, I think Microsoft stopped feature development for an extended period of time and focus on software security across Windows and Internet Explorer. This made a big difference to security. (It may have had interesting effects on the progress of Web technology.)
1
1
Are @facebook and @Twitter and @Google now looking at gaming of their algorithms as a security vulnerability the way we in the browser world now look at things that could give sites the ability to execute arbitrary code on a user's computer?
1
2
And to be clear: norms in the browser engine world are moving towards multiple layers of protection: writing code in safer languages, aggressively fixing even potential vulnerabilities, tools for software auditing, sandboxing that prevents many APIs from being called, etc.
1
1
2
I'm not entirely sure what the equivalents would be in search and recommendation algorithms. I'm not an expert in those fields. But I think if the best minds in those fields see it as a problem to be solved, there will be serious movement towards solutions.
1
1
2
I think their challenge is harder. Our solutions didn't directly impact revenue; theirs probably would have to.
2
1
Replying to @rocallahan
On the flip side, they have a lot more revenue to put towards working on those solutions.

Mar 20, 2018 · 12:06 AM UTC

1