This is the upshot: if an org serves a mission defined by a manifesto, when push comes to shove it must take a hit. nitter.vloup.ch/andreasgal/statu…
2
1
1
5
Supporting the covenant proposal and opposing the DMCA are different things. (I oppose the DMCA.)
1
The opportunity to do something about DMCA based on W3C covenant protocols has passed. What's left to do?
1
Replying to @BrendanEich @andreasgal @rocallahan
The web was stuck with EME once W3C made it part of a working group's charter. The real opportunity passed years ago.

Sep 23, 2017 · 1:46 PM UTC

2
1
Replying to @davidbaron @andreasgal @rocallahan
Can you say why you didn't want to make a safe protest vote? That's the issue still hot from the other week, not EME per se.
Replying to @davidbaron @BrendanEich @andreasgal @rocallahan
The web was stuck with EME when Google, Microsoft and Netflix decided to worked on it together (2 first implement, latter use w/ content)
2
Yup, no going back to 2013. But taming that de-facto standard via EFF's covenant, not just de-jure papering it, seemed best W3C option. Or+
1
1
more replies