We show CO₂ emissions by country of production, not country of consumption. The CO₂ emitted in China for things US uses counts as China's.
1
1
6
But China chooses how to make goods, and if we forced less efficient production via regs, it would hike prices, harming low/middle inc folks
1
Economic systems are complex organic structures, wherein manipulation for single-level outcomes often yields N-depth unintended consequences
1
You're making the well-understood concept of negative externalities sound much more complicated than it is.
2
We should price negative externalities appropriately, and have appropriate low-distortion redistribution policies.
1
But consider how many variables and unknowns an economic system contains, and that we can't reliably model systems that are far less complex
1
In this case the consequences are *intended*, and we want to let them propagate through the system. That's what markets are good at.

Jun 2, 2017 · 7:47 AM UTC

2
Propagating costs and benefits through complex systems is basically the thing that free markets do.
1
The legal framework that establishes the markets needs to ensure costs and benefits are part of the system, keep transaction costs low, etc.
So let's roll up 1 serious ripple into "Prices increase significantly, and people can't make ends meet" - you're suggesting more xfer/debt?
2
Other taxes can be reduced to balance the increased income from pollution taxes, in a way that keeps the poor no worse off, hopefully better
1