speaking purely as a layman, i'm incredulous hearing that clinton is ahead in polls by just 5% but predicted 100+ electoral vote win.
3
6
If states were uniform, ahead by 5% would mean 538-0 win. So it's a function of how nonuniform the states are.
2
and that's what seems bonkers to me. 5% ahead shouldn't be considered a unanimous mandate.
1
Replying to @getifyX @getify
5% is a decent but not huge mandate. 10% is biggest since 1984. Presidents (e.g., Bush 44) used smaller mandates for huge change.

Oct 24, 2016 · 11:29 PM UTC