@tieguy @davidbaron @TheOpenStandard for example, I'd posit that asm.js/gaming is something that has grown in an ideal fashion
2
@cwiiis @davidbaron asm.js/gaming is relatively very close to What Mozilla Is Good At.
1
2
@tieguy @davidbaron agreed, but still far enough away that I think if we just blundered in, it would have been embarassing
1
@cwiiis @davidbaron fair. (Of course, I still think Mozilla under-defines "open web" so I may not be the right person to discuss this ;)
1
@tieguy @davidbaron I wouldn't argue with that :) But perhaps we're better at 'making a browser' than we are at 'open web'...
1
@tieguy @davidbaron that said, not to diminish what people have achieved with the open web - amazing strides, all things considered
1
@cwiiis @davidbaron I think Moz could do more with the open web if it could articulate more clearly what the open web is.
1
@cwiiis @davidbaron both "open" and "web" are underspecified, but particularly web
1
@cwiiis @davidbaron e.g., would identity have been de-emphasized if it was (correctly) seen as part of the web? Ditto past rants about RSS.
1
@tieguy @davidbaron mm, shelving persona didn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but I can't profess to have a particularly big-picture view
1
