Basically has a anyone got a use case for transform-style: flat ?
5
1
@johnallsopp not making the entire page need to be represented in 3D and thus using tons of memory/cpu/gpu (i.e., a good default)
1
@davidbaron @grorg but surely it's only in 3D because I've chosen it to be?
1
@johnallsopp @grorg Also a real use case: people using 3D in separate parts of a large page that happen to nest shouldn't be surprised.
1
@davidbaron @grorg still baffled as to why 'flat' is the initial value? If I apply 3D to an element, why would I *not* want it applied?
2
Replying to @johnallsopp
@johnallsopp @grorg if you have a 3-D effect for slides in a deck, and a 3-D effect inside the slide, do you want intermediate flattening?

Sep 24, 2013 路 12:34 AM UTC

1
Replying to @davidbaron
@davidbaron @grorg by default I'd say no. I can see why you might sometimes want flat, but not by default.
1
@johnallsopp @grorg even if intermediate flattening is a lot cheaper?