Why W3C AC review is important: if anyone outside the Verifiable Credential WG had read w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/ before it went to REC they might have noticed that it doesn't define what its IDs or proofs mean.
1
5
AC review generally isn't the stage where specs get read carefully. The W3C process could use a better mechanism for detailed review, like WHATWG code review or maybe IETF AD review. It's easy for things to get to REC because everybody is happy with the general idea.
1
5
The TAG probably doesn't have the bandwidth, but it would be good to have a step (around CR) that requires one person who didn't write or edit the spec to read and review it thoroughly.
1
2
We need to find a way to make this process transparent but not painful.
1
3
Replying to @danbri @TzviyaSiegman @jyasskin
What if there's more than one "rest of W3C", each disconnected from the other? (I think that's been true in the past and may still be the case today.)

Oct 29, 2021 · 1:10 PM UTC

2
1
Replying to @davidbaron @danbri @jyasskin
I have been discussing this topic too. There are a lot of mini W3Cs. If you work on DID, do you know what's happening in CSS?
1