Why W3C AC review is important: if anyone outside the Verifiable Credential WG had read w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/ before it went to REC they might have noticed that it doesn't define what its IDs or proofs mean.
1
5
AC review generally isn't the stage where specs get read carefully. The W3C process could use a better mechanism for detailed review, like WHATWG code review or maybe IETF AD review. It's easy for things to get to REC because everybody is happy with the general idea.
1
5
Replying to @davidbaron @jyasskin
The TAG probably doesn't have the bandwidth, but it would be good to have a step (around CR) that requires one person who didn't write or edit the spec to read and review it thoroughly.

Oct 28, 2021 · 11:13 PM UTC

1
2
Replying to @davidbaron @jyasskin
We need to find a way to make this process transparent but not painful.
1
3