Mary McFadden claims the RHNA numbers are "inappropriate" for this post-COVID world
1
1
22
Cupertino homeowner and NIMBY Eric Shaefer is very concerned that his city (median home price $2.2M) will have to build too many luxury apartments under this methodology
2
1
3
46
Palo Alto resident Stuart says 10k new homes in Palo Alto (which added 25k+ jobs in the last 10 years) is "totally unrealistic." Claims Palo Alto residents will "fight this till the bitter end" and pull out of ABAG.
4
1
2
27
A member of the San Francisco Tenant's Union, Anastasia Yovanopoulos, urges rejection of the new RHNA numbers, citing Livable California's "think" tank, the Embarcadero Institute
6
2
7
40
San Mateo NIMBY Andrea McCutchin objects to our new housing targets on the basis that no one wants apartments, claims you "can't give them away right now." Says this would "kill the soul" of cities. Author's note: I know a lot of people who would disagree!
1
1
50
Don Teeter of Palo Alto (I'm sensing a pattern here) says that ABAG has made his neighborhood unlivable. Claims they need *no* new housing, of any kind, including low-income
8
4
32
Fred and Jean Schmidt claim that if we add more housing, "in 10 years the peninsula will look like a third world country." 馃槵馃槵馃槵
2
2
2
50
This image was submitted by Chris Dreike, with the caption "The California Grizzly Is Trampling Our Homes" 馃槀馃ゴ馃檭
2
3
49
Clearly not depicting one of those south bay single-story-overlay neighborhoods.
1
6
Is it too nerdy to think this is the usual way of depicting single-story overlay neighborhoods? (Note: some of those pictured here are within half a mile of the San Antonio Caltrain station, near bottom of map.)

Dec 15, 2020 路 3:05 AM UTC

2
1
(I probably should have said the single story overlay is the "(S)" in the "R-1(7000)(S)" and "R-1(8000)(S)".)
The houses being trampled on have 2.5 stories though!
1
Yeah, I know. More like a Palo Alto neighborhood built before the zoning code...