Yes, this target is wrong; it should really be somewhere around double this number. And I've said so to City Council (e.g., in cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/f… , page 75).
Quick! We all need to stop Palo Alto from being required to add 10,058 homes (houses or apartments) over the 8 year period of 2023-2031. How can a city that residents describe as being nearly as dense as Hong Kong add 1260 homes per year? This is craziness!

Oct 29, 2020 · 6:14 PM UTC

1
1
8
nearly as dense as Hong Kong WTAF have they ever *been* to Hong Kong
1
Speaking of which, I have been to Hong Kong... (Hong Kong is dense, but it also has plenty of open space.)
1
1