So, to be clear: Cancel school. Send home government workers. Give companies a hard shove towards better hygiene and engaging continuity-of-operations plans. Make costly public signals to induce better individual behavior.
2
3
40
None of this involves a draconian police state. None of it even requires legislation!!! We can do it all tomorrow for every county with any COVID patient and adjacent counties!
1
3
24
FInally, let me note that the folks critical of this plan are engaged in a "methinks she doth protest too much" situation. 12 states closed school due to influenza JUST THIS YEAR. inverse.com/article/52824-sc…
2
4
28
"It's fine for the flu, which is less lethal and for which vaccines exist, but not for COVID" is a super weird and dumb take. And if you weren't protesting it for the flu, I dunno, maybe you're just selectively outraged because you think it's fun to be mad.
1
4
35
FURTHERMORE, These procedures won't ONLY reduce COVID deaths. They'll reduce flu deaths. Pneumonia deaths. Bronchitis deaths. Heck they'll reduce transportation deaths and gun homicides too most likely.
2
3
20
And now a final twist-ending: The US has no school in summer because of agricultural history. But actually, we should cancel school during WINTER to reduce infectious disease, and keep kids in school during SUMMER, since summer has fewer holidays anyways!
6
6
2
40
We'd at least need to install air conditioning in schools in pieces like Pennsylvania where schools don't have it today but are intolerably hot for much of June, July, and August. Or at minimum better cross-ventilation.
1
Yes, we should do that anyway since academic research shows colder classrooms improve student scores.
1
Colder classrooms when learning, or colder classrooms when taking the test? Or did it distinguish?
1
Replying to @lymanstoneky
Seems more clearly worth the investment if it's shown to improve learning rather than improve test taking (or be unknown which it improves).

Feb 28, 2020 · 7:45 AM UTC