Palo Alto approved a grand total of 1 apartment building in 2018. 57 units. On the other side of 101, hundreds of kids are homeless. mercurynews.com/2018/12/09/h… Monday 1/28 at 7:45, Palo Alto City Council will take on zoning changes to promote more multi-family housing.

Changes last year were in the right direction, but Palo Alto can and should do more to promote transit-oriented housing. We have the worst jobs-housing imbalance and the highest housing costs. Palo Alto's policy and process failures harm people throughout northern California.

If you can't make it to Palo Alto City Hall on Monday night, please email city.council@cityofpaloalto.org with personal stories about how housing crisis impacts your life. Conjoined housing and climate crises require bold and urgent action. Palo Alto needs to do better.

If you're coming, here is some light reading to prep you for the public hearing. cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/f… Full meeting agenda here: cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/f… Housing item is #7. A couple thoughts.

Zoning changes are movement in the right direction and aren't a sufficient response to the crises we face. Palo Alto needs bolder actions like: legalizing apartments citywide, unbundling the cost of parking spots from the cost of housing, increasing height limits, increasing FAR.

Although we appreciate the sentiment around trying maximum unit size (incentivizing small units), we do not want policies that discourage construction of 3-4 bedroom apartments for families. Instead, we should be legalizing our 1920's buildings. Bigger, taller, less/no parking.

@davidbaron will answer this better than I will.

I think the most constraining factor in Palo Alto's multifamily and mixed-use zones is generally FAR. The building envelope limits don't matter much, and the FAR increases in this package could be important. [1/N]