So Palo Alto just approved (maybe not final approvals, but I think the difficult ones) its first affordable housing for seven years. paloaltoonline.com/news/2019…
The project proposed is a *lot* denser and bulkier than what would be allowed for a market-rate project.
1
1
2
Without that extra density and FAR, I think this project would have been a lot more expensive per unit.
In my ideal world, that extra density and FAR would be allowed everywhere. Would requiring that affordable housing go through the standard rules help get us there?
2
Or would requiring affordable housing go through the market-rate construction rules just mean the city spends the same affordable housing money on fewer units?
Unfortunately, I'd guess the latter is going to be the much more substantial effect.
2
But the biggest difference in unit type here is really that they're a lot smaller than typical market-rate for Palo Alto... which perhaps Palo Alto needs a lot more of, but which the zoning code discourages by having limits on so many numbers that there's an obvious result.
Jan 27, 2019 · 6:08 AM UTC
1
1

