Maybe that's good enough for Vancouver, but I think the Bay Area either needs 75-100 square miles of Paris-style density (uniform 8-10 stories), or it needs a ton of big condo towers near transit. Politically it seems easier to get to the latter outcome than the former.
This tweet is unavailable

Aug 18, 2018 · 5:32 PM UTC

1
1
4
This tweet is unavailable
Sure, but housing for 800K would get consumed as fast as it's built, and there will still be high demand for Bay Area housing (unless tech has moved elsewhere in the meantime). We should want more of the US population to live in dense areas.