Unpacking today's great news on California's GHG progress in a brief thread:
arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data…
6
49
27
82
The headline you're probably hearing is accurate. CA has officially met its 2020 target early, returning GHGs to 1990 levels by 2016. This is legitimately cause for (brief) celebration. I'll pause a moment to let you bask in the warm glow. 2/
1
12
2
49
O.k. that's enough of that. Hope you enjoyed the basking, we've got work to do.
How we got here: Mainly by decarbonizing the electricity sector. Wind and solar costs declined rapidly, which allowed utilities opportunity to begin transition to renewables at bargain prices 3/
3
3
20
We are clearly not *done* with the electrical sector, but clearly *are* on the right trajectory. Energy efficiency and demand response will continue to play a massive role in helping accommodate more renewables. Cheap batteries will allow even deeper penetration of variable RE 4/
1
13
A 100% zero-emitting grid is very likely achievable without assuming further developments in technology. A 90-95% zero-emitting grid certainly is. Cheap zero-emitting dispatchable generation (nuclear?) or seasonal energy storage is the last piece to hit 100% 5/
3
2
15
I'd like to see GHG emission stats that attribute industrial production to the place goods are consumed rather than the place they're produced. Would such numbers still show California hitting targets? Or are we hitting the targets because industry is moving to China, etc.?
Jul 15, 2018 · 11:38 PM UTC
1


