Engineer on @googlechrome. Involved in CSS and W3C standards. Previously @mozilla, @w3ctag. Mastodon: @dbaron@w3c.social

Rockville, Maryland, USA
Joined March 2008
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Specification for the mask-image and other mask-* properties is the Positioned Masks section of drafts.fxtf.org/css-masking-…
1
1
This means we now have the syntax for the 'mask' shorthand, and mask-* like the background-* properties. MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/…
1
1
2
Developer Edition of @Firefox 53 now has CSS mask-image (etc.) for CSS masks like background-* prop's. File bugs at bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_b…
1
7
1
7
Replying to @shaunrashid
No, subgrid is not included. (But we already implement display:contents, which can do some of the things subgrid can do.)
1
Replying to @blassey
Sure, employees of oil companies are one of many parties affected by environmental policies, and should be considered.
Replying to @blassey
But nearly all government policy, including the creation of a government in the first place, involves wealth redistribution.
Replying to @davidbaron @blassey
My original objection was that "paying for" seemed to obscure that the effects of the policy were not a simple transfer.
Replying to @davidbaron @blassey
... and not consider "oil companies" as entities deserving of fundamentals like food & housing in the way people are.
2
Replying to @blassey
Sure, evaluating effects of changes to policy is good. But I'd evaluate them against categories like income/wealth distribution...
1
Replying to @davidbaron @blassey
... produced by the sum of government policies (which are hopefully good for their own reasons) and adjust appropriately.
1
Replying to @davidbaron @blassey
Rather than using that to argue that police should be paid for only by the rich, we should consider the overall distribution...
2
Replying to @davidbaron @blassey
e.g., having police to protect against theft increases wealth inequality.
1
Replying to @davidbaron @blassey
Distribution needs to be considered globally, not one policy at a time.
3
Replying to @blassey
Things about "who bears the cost" of a very specific policy aren't interesting since basically *all* policy effects distribution
1
Replying to @blassey
Right, so it will raise oil prices some, reduce oil usage some, and the same for things that depend on oil.
Replying to @blassey
Distributional aspects can be corrected by other policies that change distribution. But don't know what you mean by "still paid".
1
Replying to @blassey
not the case for taxes on negative externalities like pollution: those are net positive.
2
Replying to @blassey
But “paying for” implies zero sum transfer. This involves net losses, to Mexicans and Americans.
1