Engineer on @googlechrome. Involved in CSS and W3C standards. Previously @mozilla, @w3ctag. Mastodon: @dbaron@w3c.social

Rockville, Maryland, USA
Joined March 2008
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Also processing of provisional ballots (where whether voter was allowed to vote unclear on election day)
2
Replying to @gsnedders
One reason is that vote by mail ballots need to be postmarked on or before election day and received by Monday following
3
This changes trust in law enforcement. I will likely see FBI as an arm of the Repub. party for the rest of my life.
I'm actually surprised there aren't more Comey-cost-Clinton-the-election takes. You can make a pretty good argument.
2
3
7
It's going to be a bigger margin than that:
California county elections officials estimate 4.36 million outstanding ballots to process and count.: elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/sta… 1/2
Replying to @zeynep
Unemployment numbers aren't low if you look at the appropriate ones, like cepr.net/publications/graphi…
Et je suis un citoyen américain, et je pense que ce n'est pas démocratique.
3
1
Replying to @NicolasSarkozy
Est-il démocratique donner la victoire au candidat avec moins de voix?
2
Replying to @chrisrockwell
I don't agree with everything in that article, but thought it worth sharing. What did you consider hateful?
1
And Opera 12 is right. This is the latest revision of the specification or that Chrome has been with this bug for many years?
1
1
And also blame the Republican congress for refusing a second round of stimulus and keeping the economy in rough (but not disastrous) shape.
1
2
Replying to @yisibl
I think the spec has been stable since shortly before I wrote dbaron.org/log/20110225-blur… , i.e., 5.5-6 years.
Replying to @yisibl
Yes, looks right to me. (Assuming I have right/wrong the right way round. :-)
1
I think WebKitGTK is right on CSS and wrong on canvas, but I didn't test WebKit on Mac.
1
1
dbaron.org/css/test/2016/sha… shows CSS vs canvas blur radius. I *think* Gecko right, Chromium wrong, Edge wrong on CSS only. #EdgeBug
5
1
5
Replying to @glazou
Missed what? That was the final forecast based on polling.
1
Note that above assumed NH and MN to Clinton and AZ and MI to Trump. NH now switched to few hundred votes on the Trump side.
Replying to @glazou
How is that mistaken? They're probabilities, and error is expected to correlate between states.
The @FiveThirtyEight forecast was not bad: p(T)>.5: 25T .5<p(C)<.6: 1C 2T .6<p(C)<.7: 1C .7<p(C)<.8: 1C 2T .8<p(C)<.9: 4C 1T p(C)>.9: 14C
1
4
Replying to @jensimmons
I would place more blame on (Republican-enforced) macroeconomic policy that prioritized austerity over full employment.
The @FiveThirtyEight forecast was not bad: p(T)>.5: 25T .5<p(C)<.6: 1C 2T .6<p(C)<.7: 1C .7<p(C)<.8: 1C 2T .8<p(C)<.9: 4C 1T p(C)>.9: 14C
2
1
2