nitter
Bil Corry
@bilcorry
22 Apr 2013
Three
@OWASP
staffers are disappointed with how the BoD handled the hiring of the Executive Director:
lists.owasp.org/pipermail/ow…
Apr 22, 2013 · 8:22 AM UTC
2
Bil Corry
@bilcorry
23 Apr 2013
@azwilsong
@manicode
That's what the BoD thinks the issue is about (promoting Sarah) but it's not, which is why I doubt anything will change
2
more replies
owasp
@owasp
23 Apr 2013
Replying to
@bilcorry
@bilcorry
The decision to promote Sarah to ED seems to be supported by most even if the process was imperfect. We will do better next time.
2
Bil Corry
@bilcorry
23 Apr 2013
@owasp
Maybe. Reaction by BoD seems to be 'we did nothing wrong' which misses the point. Learning comes from understanding.
1
more replies
Jim Manico @ AllAroundTheWorld
@manicode
23 Apr 2013
@azwilsong
@bilcorry
I •think• Bil is upset that we did not do a search for other candidates. That's a fair concern, even if I disagree.
1
Bil Corry
@bilcorry
23 Apr 2013
@manicode
@azwilsong I have no concerns with the lack of search. The issue is communication, which the staffers captured in their email.
1
1
more replies
owasp
@owasp
23 Apr 2013
Replying to
@bilcorry
@bilcorry
Bil, we informed our other director (Kate) and in general did the best we could. The •decision• was supported by staff, btw.